|
"New Pictures and A Poll"
04/07/2001
Okay, if you're all done chuckling over Friday's avian adventure, I've got something I need some opinions on. I finally got back the pictures from Cronnacht's Birthday Bash last month. There aren't that many of them, but I'm trying out a new format (which I blatantly and sneakily stole from Sherry the RedHairedHottie) for showing pictures. You can compare the new with the old way (not, of course, that Faith is old or anything...) and tell me which you prefer in the comments below. (That would be the "What's your 2 pence?" link at the bottom of this post for those of you that just arrived on the short bus). I still like the "links in the story" style for things like Faire reviews, but for events that I don't really write that much about... I'm wondering how many people like having thumbnails as picture links. I mean besides for scanning porn.
So which way do you feel enhances your total picture viewing experience?
10 coins donated so far...oldest to newest |
Ah, you sneaky little thief!! I shall pay you back for stealing my script by stealing your photos!! muahahahahahahaha
~ red haired hottie   @ 8:19 p.m. EST on 04/08/2001
|
|
It's not stealing if I already told you to take them. :-p
~ Gareth @ 8:33 p.m. EST on 04/08/2001
|
|
I prefer the thumbnail style for general event photos (like Faire or party pics), but having a bit o'commentary to introduce the new group of photos is a good idea, with some clever and amusing desciption of each photo's subject is good too (it helps for group pics or where you can't tell who's in the pic from the thumbnail)
I did like the way you linked Faith's housewarming party pics, though: but mainly because of your clever discription of the evening and the appropriate use of photos to illustrate some of the more bizarre aspects of the evening.
Long, short? go with the thumbnails.
Cheers Chieftain!
~ Ani Moore-MacDobhran? :) @ 10:19 p.m. EST on 04/08/2001
|
|
"The requested URL /include/type.js was not found on this server."
:( *Pout* I can't see it !
-keltik (who really wants to see these)
~ Keltik @ 9:53 a.m. EST on 04/09/2001
|
|
For what its worth in the trouble-shooting Dept.,
I *can* see sherry's pix just fine... *G*
~ Keltik @ 9:57 a.m. EST on 04/09/2001
|
|
It should work now. Just had to get rid of a little piece of coding that was messing up Netscape. Have fun.
~ Gareth @ 12:00 p.m. EST on 04/09/2001
|
|
woorks bee-youtifully now....
Muchas Gracias! :)
~ Keltik @ 11:38 p.m. EST on 04/09/2001
|
|
It's okaaaaaaaay I guess. I like Sherry's better though. Face it, I just like her more than I like you. heh heh.
Looks good hon. Really.
~ S'tan @ 2:29 p.m. EST on 04/11/2001
|
|
And has everyone read the NEWEST Scoundrel's Sanctum article?!?! Wow... what literary skill.... what incredible wit... what impressive horns!
And I hear he's cute too!
~ Gareth @ 4:30 p.m. EST on 04/11/2001
|
|
Your decision to remove the type.js script line was a good one, that script is not for the photo sections, it is for my toolbar.
~ red haired hottie @ 9:34 p.m. EST on 04/12/2001
|
|
